CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
BEAU DARRELL HEIMER,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
COMPANION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 16-2274
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
No. 1:15-cv-00338—Janet T. Neff, District Judge.
Argued: November 30, 2017
Decided and Filed: January 2, 2018
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; McKEAGUE and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COLE, Chief Judge. This matter is about whether a contract should mean what it says. After Beau Darrell Heimer was injured in a motorbike accident, he filed an insurance claim with Companion Life for the bill. Companion Life denied the claim, citing a plan exclusion that disclaimed coverage for injuries resulting from the “illegal use of alcohol.” But the district court read “illegal use of alcohol” to disclaim coverage only for the illegal consumption of alcohol, and not for Heimer’s illegal post-consumption conduct of operating a motorbike while under the influence of alcohol. The district court’s reading is consistent with the ordinary meaning of “use” and best gives effect to the contract as a whole. We affirm.