CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
LYNIECE NELSON, on behalf of herself individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Henry Hilliard a.k.a. Shelly Hilliard,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS, et al,
Defendants,

CHAD WOLOWIEC,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 15-2441
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Ann Arbor.
No. 5:13-cv-10632—Judith E. Levy, District Judge.
Argued: October 18, 2016
Decided and Filed: January 9, 2017
Before: KEITH, BATCHELDER, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. Oakland County Police Officer Chad Wolowiec (“Officer Wolowiec”) appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment against Lyniece Nelson’s (“Nelson”) § 1983 claims against him in connection with her daughter’s death. We AFFIRM



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
RYAN BROWN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
KENNETH ROMANOWSKI, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
   No. 15-1823
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:13-cv-11367—Matthew F. Leitman, District Judge.
Argued: October 19, 2016
Decided and Filed: January 9, 2017
Before: BOGGS, SUHRHEINRICH, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

Petitioner-Appellant Ryan Brown, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus based on violations of his speedy-trial rights and related claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
AMY SANDERS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LAMAR JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 15-6384
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Tennessee at Jackson.
No. 1:14-cv-01239—J. Daniel Breen, District Judge.
Argued: October 18, 2016
Decided and Filed: January 9, 2017
Before: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

Defendant Lamar Jones (“Jones”), a police officer with the Decatur County Sheriff’s Department, conducted a controlled buy of marijuana on May 22, 2013, through a confidential informant (“CI”) as part of a county-wide drug–bust operation. Plaintiff Amy Sanders (“Sanders”) alleges that Jones prepared a misleading police report and gave false grand jury testimony identifying Sanders as the person who sold the CI drugs. Based on these allegations, Sanders brought a § 1983 action against Jones for malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Jones moved for summary judgment on the basis of absolute and qualified immunity, and the district court denied both defenses. Jones appeals that decision.

Jones’s absolute immunity defense presents a question of first impression about how the Supreme Court’s provision of absolute immunity for grand jury witnesses in Rehberg v. Paulk, 132 S. Ct. 1497 (2012), intersects with the Sixth Circuit’s requirements for malicious prosecution claims where a grand jury indicted the plaintiff. The issue compels us to revisit the test applied in Webb v. United States, 789 F.3d 647 (6th Cir. 2015) and other Sixth Circuit cases requiring an indicted plaintiff to present evidence that the defendant provided false testimony to the grand jury. In light of Rehberg’s absolute immunity for false grand jury testimony, Rehberg precludes Sanders’s malicious prosecution claim because she cannot rebut the indictment’s presumption of probable cause without using Jones’s grand jury testimony.