CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TALMAN HARRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 17-3087
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
No. 1:15-cr-00335-2—Benita Y. Pearson, District Judge.
Argued: December 7, 2017
Decided and Filed: February 5, 2018
Before: SILER, WHITE, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

SILER, Circuit Judge. Talman Harris appeals his criminal convictions and sentences, arguing that the district court erred by: (1) barring Harris from impeaching a government witness; (2) admitting government summary evidence; (3) giving an inaccurate jury instruction with regard to a stockbroker’s fiduciary duties; and (4) failing to investigate potential extraneous influence on a juror.

Because the district court abused its discretion by not allowing Harris to introduce a prior inconsistent statement for impeachment purposes, we reverse Harris’s conviction for obstruction of justice and remand for a new trial on that count. The district court did not, however, err in admitting the summary exhibits and in rendering the fiduciary-duty jury instruction, so we affirm the district court’s rulings on Harris’s second and third assignments of error. Finally, because Harris presented a colorable claim of extraneous influence on a juror, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227 (1954), or by denying defense counsel’s request to question the juror and his friend. Thus, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for a Remmer hearing.