CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM EUGENE HINES, Defendant-Appellee.
   No. 17-5893
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville.
No. 3:16-cr-00005-1—Joseph H. McKinley Jr., Chief District Judge.
Argued: March 8, 2018
Decided and Filed: March 22, 2018
Before: MOORE, COOK, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COOK, Circuit Judge. Not all search warrant affidavits include the same ingredients. It is the mix that courts review to decide whether evidence generated from the search may be used or must be suppressed. Some affidavits describe in fine detail a confidential informant’s reliability, whereas others emphasize the tipster’s basis of knowledge. Some discuss controlled drug buys by police officers looking to corroborate a tip, and others spotlight a suspect’s criminal history. There isn’t a singular formula; we consider the affidavit proper if, in its totality, it sufficiently demonstrates probable cause for that search warrant.

Finding the affidavit in this case insufficient to establish probable cause, the district court suppressed evidence recovered during a search. We decide that the totality of the circumstances dictates otherwise, however, and REVERSE.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
MELISA RICHMOND,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RUBAB HUQ, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 16-2560
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Ann Arbor.
No. 5:14-cv-14892—John Corbett O’Meara, District Judge.
Argued: July 28, 2017
Decided and Filed: March 22, 2018
Before: MOORE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
SECOND AMENDED OPINION
_________________________

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Melisa Richmond was incarcerated in the Wayne County Jail from December 26, 2012 through February 13, 2013. While in the custody of the Jail, Richmond received treatment for a self-inflicted burn wound on her chest as well as for psychological needs. Richmond contends that she received constitutionally inadequate treatment for her burn wound, which necessitated skin grafting surgery shortly after her release from the Jail’s custody. She also contends that she was unconstitutionally deprived of her psychiatric medication for over two weeks while in custody. The district court below granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on the grounds that Richmond failed to show a constitutional violation. For the reasons described below, we REVERSE in part and AFFIRM in part the ruling of the district court.