CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
ANTHONY T. POTTER,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
   No. 16-6628
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Pikeville.
Nos. 7:03-cr-00021; 7:16-cv-00041—Danny C. Reeves, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: April 17, 2018
Before: GUY, SUTTON, and COOK, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. The Armed Career Criminal Act imposes a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence on repeat offenders—those who have three or more previous convictions for a “violent felony.” After the district court sentenced Anthony Potter as a repeat offender, Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), held that one feature of the Act (the residual clause) violates the Constitution’s prohibition against vague criminal laws. Potter asked to be resentenced in a successive § 2255 motion, claiming he did not qualify as a repeat offender. The district court declined the request on the ground that he sentenced Potter under a different clause (the enumerated-crimes clause) of the Act. We affirm because the same district court judge who sentenced him was in a better position than anyone else to know why he applied the Act and because at all events Potter did not meet his burden of showing that the court used the residual clause to increase his sentence.