CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
PROGRESSIVE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE MARKET DRIVER, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 16-1830
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids.
No. 1:14-cv-00430—Gordon J. Quist, District Judge.
Argued: January 26, 2017
Decided and Filed: May 3, 2017
Before: GUY, CLAY, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. (“Progressive”) brought suit against Defendants, United Parcel Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation, United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio corporation, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and United Parcel Service Market Driver, a Georgia corporation (collectively referred to herein as “UPS”), alleging that UPS violated the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 455.091, et seq., and the common law governing service marks, trademarks and unfair competition. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of UPS. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.