CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, acting in its capacity as owner trustee of AEGCO Trust 1, AEGCO Trust 2, AEGCO Trust 5, I&M Trust 1, I&M Trust 2, and I&M Trust 5, and not in their individual capacities,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AEP GENERATING COMPANY, an Ohio corporation; INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY, an Indiana corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 16-3496
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
No. 2:13-cv-01213—Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Argued: March 9, 2017
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2017
Before: CLAY, SUTTON, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
AMENDED OPINION
_________________________

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Nearly twenty years after defendants built, sold, and leased back a coal-burning power plant, they committed to either make over a billion dollars of emission control improvements to the plant, or shut it down. Defendants did so by way of a consent decree, resolving various lawsuits involving alleged Clean Air Act violations at their other power plants. The genesis of this dispute is what happened next: they successfully obtained a modification to the consent decree providing that these improvements need not be made until after their lease expired, thus pushing their commitments to improve the air quality of the plant’s emissions to the plant’s owners (represented here by plaintiff, their trustee). The district court held this encumbrance did not violate the terms of the parties’ contracts governing the sale and leaseback arrangement, and that plaintiff’s breach of contract claims precluded it from maintaining an alternative cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
BRUCE COREY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; EATON CORPORATION; EATON CORPORATION DISABILITY PLAN FOR U.S. EMPLOYEES; EATON HEALTH AND WELFARE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 16-3817
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
No. 1:15-cv-01736—Patricia A. Gaughan, District Judge.
Argued: March 16, 2017
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2017
Before: BOGGS, ROGERS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COOK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Bruce Corey worked as a machine operator in Eaton Corporation’s Northern Ohio factory. Corey has long suffered from cluster headaches— extremely painful attacks that strike several times per day for weeks on end. In 2014, Corey applied for short-term disability benefits under Eaton’s disability plan after a bout of headaches forced him to miss work. After granting a period of disability, the third party administering Eaton’s disability plan (“the Administrator”) discontinued benefits because Corey failed to provide objective findings of disability.

Under the plan, “[o]bjective findings include . . . [m]edications and/or treatment plan.” Corey’s physicians treated his headaches by prescribing prednisone, injecting Imitrex (a headache medication), administering oxygen therapy, and performing an occipital nerve block. We must decide whether Corey’s medication and treatment plan satisfy the plan’s objectivefindings requirement. We hold that it does and therefore REVERSE the district court’s contrary decision.