CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
BARBARA FLETCHER; TIMOTHY PHILPOT; MARCIA FINK; LUCINDA SMITH,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant
   No. 17-3277
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton.
No. 3:16-cv-00302—Walter H. Rice, District Judge.
Argued: December 5, 2017
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2018
Before: CLAY, GIBBONS, and BUSH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated retirees, retirees’ surviving spouses, and eligible dependents, filed suit against Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. to enforce their rights to retirement healthcare benefits under a series of Collective Bargaining Agreements (“CBAs”). The district court held that the CBAs were ambiguous and relied on extrinsic evidence for its conclusion that the parties intended retiree healthcare benefits to vest for life. Because we hold that the CBAs are unambiguous, we reverse the district court’s judgment.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TREVON BARCUS,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 17-5646
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville.
No. 3:16-cr-00113-1—Thomas W. Phillips, District Judge.
Argued: April 25, 2018
Decided and Filed: June 8, 2018
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; GUY and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COLE, Chief Judge. This matter presents a familiar question in our court: what special penalties are placed on sex offenders for violating the law? Trevon Barcus is a sex offender. After cutting off his ankle bracelet and fleeing to Texas, Barcus pleaded guilty to failing to register as a sex offender as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”). The district court sentenced him to 30 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release with special sex offender conditions of supervision. Barcus now challenges his sentence on three fronts: (1) that the district court incorrectly classified him as a Tier III sex offender, (2) that the district court incorrectly interpreted the Sentencing Guidelines when it found that Tennessee “community supervision for life” qualified as a criminal justice sentence, and (3) that the special sex offender conditions of supervision are unreasonable.

Because we agree that Barcus was incorrectly classified as a Tier III sex offender, we vacate Barcus’s sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing