CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 16-2132
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:16-mc-50588—Arthur J. Tarnow, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: June 9, 2017
Before: NORRIS, MOORE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the scope of evidence that Plaintiff-Appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) may obtain in investigating charges of discrimination. Sinisa Matovski, an operations manager for DefendantAppellant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) who has a disability, filed an EEOC charge claiming that UPS discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). In particular, Matovski claims that UPS published confidential medical information about him and other employees on its intranet page. The EEOC began an investigation into Matovski’s claims, which resulted in a subpoena that requested information about how UPS stored and disclosed employee medical information. UPS opposed the subpoena, claiming that the requested information was irrelevant to Matovski’s charge. This resulted in the EEOC filing an application to enforce the subpoena. The district court granted the application, and UPS has appealed. Because the information that the EEOC requests “relates to unlawful employment practices” covered by the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e- 8(a) (2012), we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BRYANT LAMAR MONIE,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 16-6244
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington.
No. 5:15-cr-00116-1—Danny C. Reeves, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: June 9, 2017
Before: MOORE, GILMAN, and COOK, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Bryant Lamar Monie seeks to have this court order the district court to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea because at his plea hearing the district court told him that the maximum sentence for Count 8 was ten years, when in fact Count 8 carried a mandatory-minimum sentence of fifteen years. Because the district court’s misstatement was plain error, we REMAND the case to the district court with instructions that Monie be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to Count 8 and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.