CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
VICTOR J. STITT, II,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 14-6158
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Winchester.
No. 4:12-cr-00019-1—Harry S. Mattice Jr., District Judge.
Decided and Filed: June 27, 2017
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS,
ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE,
WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

COOK, Circuit Judge. In 2007, we held that a conviction under Tennessee’s aggravatedburglary statute, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-403, categorically qualifies as an enumerated “violent felony” that triggers a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). United States v. Nance, 481 F.3d 882, 887 (6th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Priddy, 808 F.3d 676, 684 (6th Cir. 2015). Several years later, we reached the opposite conclusion about Ohio’s similarly worded burglary statute, Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.12(A)(3). United States v. Coleman, 655 F.3d 480, 482 (6th Cir. 2011), abrogated on other grounds by Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2563 (2015). We resolve this conflict by overruling Nance and holding that a conviction for Tennessee aggravated burglary is not a violent felony for purposes of the ACCA.