CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
LEO PARRINO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THOMAS E. PRICE, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; GLENN A. FINE, Inspector General,
Defendants-Appellees.
   No. 16-5145
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville.
No. 3:14-cv-00038—Thomas B. Russell, District Judge.
Argued: April 25, 2017
Decided and Filed: June 12, 2017
Before: SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Leo Parrino, a licensed pharmacist, pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor crime of introducing misbranded drugs into interstate commerce. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), acting through the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”), notified Parrino shortly thereafter that, due to his guilty plea, he would be excluded from participating in federal health care programs for five years, as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a). Parrino filed this lawsuit, alleging that the exclusion violated his Fifth Amendment substantive due process rights and that HHS acted arbitrarily and capriciously in excluding him. The district court dismissed his suit, and Parrino appealed. We affirm.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
BIJOU SENE,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General,
Respondent.
   No. 15-4007
On Petition for Review from an Order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
No. A 095 569 029.
Decided and Filed: February 8, 2017
Before: BATCHELDER, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

PER CURIAM. Bijou Sene petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from the denial of her application for withholding of removal.

...

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Sene failed to show that it is more likely than not that she would be subject to persecution in Senegal, “where the country reports indicate that FGM is a criminal offense that is not commonly committed against adult women and the record likewise does not support her fear of any other form of harm.” (AR 5). See Dieng v. Holder, 698 F.3d 866, 873-74 (6th Cir. 2012) (holding that a fear of FGM of an adult woman who “has effectively ‘aged out’ of the threat of FGM in Senegal” did not support a claim for asylum, let alone withholding of removal). Accordingly, we DENY Sene’s petition for review.