CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LAQUINTON PERRY,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 16-6285
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis.
No. 2:15-cr-20154-1—John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr., District Judge.
Decided and Filed: July 19, 2017
Before: ROGERS, COOK, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Laquinton Perry, having conditionally pled guilty to conspiring to possess narcotics with intent to distribute, appeals the preserved evidentiary issue of whether a search warrant for Perry’s apartment was supported by probable cause. Perry contends that the activities indicating drug sales that were observed over the seven weeks before the issuance of the search warrant were stale evidence because the activities were not individually dated. The observations, according to Perry, may have been too old to indicate that drug evidence would probably be found in the apartment, while at the same time not concentrated or old enough to indicate continuous or entrenched criminal activity. Even without specific dates, however, the amount of suspicious activity observed within the seven weeks in connection with Perry’s apartment was enough to support probable cause in this case.



CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
RONALD JOSEPH MITCHELL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Joseph Mitchell, deceased,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN SCHLABACH, Officer,
Defendant-Appellee.
   No. 16-1522
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Western District of Michigan at Marquette.
No. 2:15-cv-00016—Timothy P. Greeley, Magistrate Judge.
Decided and Filed: July 19, 2017
Before: MERRITT, MOORE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellee Justin Schlabach, an officer of the Munising Police Department, shot and killed Timothy Mitchell (“Mitchell”) following a lengthy and dangerous car chase. The crucial facts at the scene of the shooting were recorded on the officer’s dashboard camera, and our decision in this case turns in large measure on this evidence. Plaintiff-Appellant Ronald Mitchell filed this § 1983 suit against Schlabach on behalf of Mitchell’s estate seeking damages for Schlabach’s alleged violation of Mitchell’s right to be free from excessive force under the Fourth Amendment. Schlabach moved for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, and the district court granted his motion. For the reasons articulated below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.