CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
DONNA W. SHERWOOD; JEROME D. PINN; VANCE SHERWOOD; ANTHONY BILLINGSLEY; JENNIFER PEET; RICHARD EUGENE WILLIAMS; FRANK L. OAKBERG; BONNIE E. OAKBERG; GERRY M. WILLIAMS; HAROLD P. SLOVES; FELICITAS K. SLOVES; SHEILA D. BOOE; THOMAS R. WARREN, JR.; JEFFREY G. SEE,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
   No. 15-6161
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville.
No. 3:12-cv-00156—Thomas A. Varlan, Chief District Judge.
Argued: October 19, 2016
Decided and Filed: November 17, 2016
Before: ROGERS and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; MALONEY, District Judge.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Sixth Circuit for the second time. Sherwood and the other plaintiffs–appellants claim that TVA was arbitrary and capricious when it implemented a new, mandatory policy to cut down all trees capable of reaching fifteen feet within its right of ways without conducting any environmental review, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. On Sherwood’s first appeal, we held that TVA had not submitted an administrative record for the new policy and remanded the case so that TVA could compile the record, and so that the district court could evaluate the merits of Sherwood’s NEPA claim. On remand, TVA asserted that it could not produce an administrative record and moved to dismiss the case as moot. In support, TVA submitted two affidavits stating that the responsible TVA official had suspended use of the policy. In response, the plaintiffs introduced evidence indicating that TVA had not abandoned the policy. Relying on TVA’s affidavits, the district court dismissed the case as moot, which Sherwood now appeals. Because record evidence suggests that TVA’s challenged policy has a continuing effect, TVA failed to prove that Sherwood’s NEPA claim is moot.